February 27, 2009 – 5:13 pm
Confession time: I happen to love the series Law and Order. Always have. In fact, if you were to ask me, I could recite for you its opening lines (“in the criminal justice system, the people are represented by two separate yet equally important groups…”). I blame my fascination on my involvement in high school mock trial teams, and the fact that I nearly became a lawyer.
So, when I saw that L&O has crossed the ocean to the UK, you know I had to check it out. Imagine my surprise to find that the actor who plays Lee Adama on BSG (Jamie Bamber) is one of the series’ stars!
I haven’t finished watching the episode yet, but if you want to try it out for yourself, it’s up on TvShack.
February 27, 2009 – 4:08 pm
let all go-the
big small middling
tall bigger really
the biggest and all
things-let all go
dear
so comes love
ee cummings
via
February 27, 2009 – 10:10 am
Via a twitter friend, here’s a link to coupon codes for $10 off a $40 purchase — with free shipping!
Because, who doesn’t need MORE books in their library?
February 27, 2009 – 12:14 am
Do you think of yourself as an atheist? Agnostic? Freethinker? Humanist? Spiritual Nontheist? … If you don’t fit the stereotypes, you’re in luck. Probably all you have to do to start messing with people’s categories is:
1. Find a kind, matter-of-fact way to let people know you lack a god concept.
2. Be yourself.
If you do fit the stereotypes, please — get some help. And try to take a little break from kicking puppies between now and that first therapy appointment.
Seriously, a key quality of stereotypes is that the more dramatically wrong they are, the easier it is to violate them.
One reason why I don’t mind being called an “atheist” is that I’m out to break those stereotypes that religious folk put on that “A” label. “Atheist” is mean to be a slam and judgement on a person’s character. So part of me feels that by accepting this label, I’m also forcing the people that know (and love) me to reexamine their initial, visceral reaction to the word itself. [plus, who wouldn't want to reclaim a scarlet letter as their own?!]
That said, however, I’m actually not that attached to the word or label of atheist. I tend to prefer calling myself an atheist rather than an “agnostic,” if only because so many religious people tend to think you’re one step closer to conversion if you take the “I don’t know” position. But, I can also see Sam Harris’s point of view when he writes in “The Problem of Atheism”:
I think that “atheist” is a term that we do not need, in the same way that we don’t need a word for someone who rejects astrology. We simply do not call people “non-astrologers.” All we need are words like “reason” and “evidence” and “common sense” and “bullshit” to put astrologers in their place, and so it could be with religion.
I get that.
I guess that leaves me not knowing “what” I am — other than someone who doesn’t need a labeled ideology or a god to give me an identity.